Here is the third part of 'Radical science legacy'.
*GI: Your radical science practice in the 70s was interwoven with a number of other social and intellectual movements or formations. Would you comment on this, and its significance for ‘radical science’ today?* xxx radical science today? xxx class xxx politics of (re)production; production of knowledges and capabilities - *formación* xxx feminism, history, first-person accounts xxx cultural production, anthropology, ethnography, ethnomethodology xxx facilitation, production at the margins xxx economics, rank and file trade union struggle, economy from below
*GI: A pivot in your own practice in the mid 70s was 'The Lucas Plan': a campaign of the joint shop stewards’ combine committee in the Lucas Aerospace corporation. Would you say what this was, what impact it had on your own trajectory, and what is has to do with 'radical science'?* Lucas - The workers know
*GI: EP Thompson's work*, The making of the English working class, *was a founding text for the New Left in Britain. What did it contribute to your own radical science practice?* Becoming working class
xxx Becoming working class in the end of rank and file union militancy. The professional-managerial class.
*GI: I understand that a major influence on perceptions - and perhaps on commitments - in the early 70s came from Ivan Illich. Would you outline how this relates to the phenomenon of the professional-managerial class and radical practice in the 70s?* Ivan Illich, the vernacular and facilitation
*GI: In the 70s two strong cultural-political currents were feminism, with the assertion that *the personal is political* and its view from the margins, and the emergence of ‘history from below’ and oral history in particular. In what ways did these determine your own radical science trajectory?* Politics of margins
*GP: Neo-Marxism(s) abounded in the 1970s. What would you say of the significance for science studies and radical science practice of 'labour process' Marxism?* Labour process Marxism
*GI: As radical science began to transmute (perhaps, degenerate?) into STS at the turn of the 70s you moved into the sphere of radical practices in economics. What was the significance of the Greater London Council in this movement, and how did it shape your radical science trajectory?* Producing a regional economy 'for labour'