Here is the fifth part of radical science legacy.
*GI: Your practice is pretty hybrid! Science, technology; industry, academia; economics, philosophy; business school, ‘Left’ government experimentation; first-person biography, labour-process theorising, ';travelogue'; etc. Can you account for this, and comment on ways in which this might be more ‘STS’ and less ‘radical science’ in its aesthetic?* - xxx
*GI: In what way do you regard this as an aspect of organic intellectual commitment? And in what ways does this inhabit a space of discomfort between radical science and STS?* - xxx